This will be a strange post. I don't have any news really, so this will be full of random thoughts. First thought...it's HOT AND HUMID in South Carolina in the summer! Like you didn't already know that right? But I stepped out of my apartment today and it was so humid that I felt like I was in a clothes dryer or sauna. Amazing! I'm going to need a second job to pay for air conditioning! I think it must be the moisture that makes it so beautiful out here though so who am I to complain when I love the natural surroundings right?
My second thought is that I'm really enjoying the curriculum theory class I'm taking this summer. It's whirlwind fast, but I've learned a lot about trends in what we teach our kids. The first textbook we read (yes, an ENTIRE textbook in a week and a half!) was about curriculum from 1890's to 1950's and it's amazing how little has changed. This era is called the progressive era and the idea is that there were communities of scholars challenging the traditional five subjects curriculum (that traditional curriculum was supported by the humanists...interesting perspective huh?). One group that challenged it advocated for more child-centered instruction instead of subject centered. They were called developmentalists and wanted to use children's interests to decide what to teach. Another group, called social efficiency, was all about putting business practices into education. They suggested that the most cost effective education was one that prepared children for their future occupation. That's where vocational education, driver's ed, etc. first came into schools. The last group was the social meliorists and their focus was on using education to stop inequities and marginalization among American society. Is there one group with whom you agree most? Really an unfair question since I only gave each group one sentence! But what I think is particularly interesting is how long such arguments have gone on and how much of it we see and hear about today. The book also emphasized the role historical events played in the curriculum. For example, after Sputnik, it was back to traditional curriculum because we got behind playing around with other curricula and lost to the Soviets. Or, how, World War I caused many kids to leave school early and so developmentalists were at the forefront because if we taught to the kids' interests, they might stay in school longer. And I'm sure you can imagine that during the Depression, social meliorists seemed the way to go. It's all very interesting I think.
Well, last topic of the day is about scheduling. I'd love to have some Californians come visit South Carolina (and of course visit me!) and I'd love to come out to California sometime this summer. Here's my summer schedule (oops, it wouldn't fit so just email me for details and I'll attach my calendar) if you can fit anything in, let me know. I'm so excited that my cousin Valerie is coming in July and my parents are coming back (I hope!) to help me move. Speaking of which, if anyone here in Clemson knows of local movers that are reliable and inexpensive, PLEASE let me know because I'm looking for movers in July (July 20th ish).
Here's a picture of my ADORABLE cousin Valerie's baby Iris. She's SOOOOO cute that I had to share (Thanks Tiff for sending the pictures to me!).
